| Item |
Type |
Comment |
Response |
| 4.1 |
Clarification |
Will the existing 3.0.x packages also preserve the same dependencies as they have today? |
|
| 4.5.1.1 |
Question |
Any updates to the "classification" meta-data? What about other meta-data such as maintainer, upstream code, etc, which seem to be available in the latest UC2 and associated maven plugin? This is maybe more of a question for non-core GlassFish packages. |
|
| 4.5.1.1 |
Question |
Should shoal and glassfish-ant-tasks packages which currently are listed as not having any dependency depend on at least, say glassfish-nucleus? |
|
| 4.5.1.1 |
Clarification |
What is the expected size of glassfish-cluster-gui? Would it make sense to have this be part of glassfish-gui instead? I would imagine a user wanting all or nothing when it comes to GUI, not everything expect the cluster-related part |
|
| 4.5.1.1 |
Clarification |
Those packages available only from the update center, it should probably be stated that this is from the "stable" repository |
|
| 4.5.1.1 |
Question |
With IPS, how can one package glassfish-jms-ra replace another glassfish-generic-ra? |
|
| 4.9 |
Question |
Will the I18N and L10N packages double the number of packages available from the update center? If I installed the non-ML version, can I just not see them? |
|
| 4.10.3 |
Clarification |
Can you explain the role of incorporation packages? |
|
| 4.13.2 |
Question |
Is UpdateCenter 3.2 the version that presents the user with the license when installing a package from the CLI (pkg)? |
|
